<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Rich Rosen on O&apos;Reilly Broadcast</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/atom.xml" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2008-08-07://53</id>
<updated>2009-07-07T19:41:50Z</updated>

<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>

<entry>
<title>Gmail&apos;s Labels Now More Like Folders: A Good Thing?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/07/gmails-labels-now-more-like-fo.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.37452</id>

<published>2009-07-07T19:41:50Z</published>
<updated>2009-07-07T19:41:50Z</updated>

<summary>Gmail had a great idea: replacing the limitations of hierarchical folders with the flexibility of labels. Now they are promoting the notion that they&apos;ve &quot;improved&quot; Gmail by making labels work more like folders. How is that an improvement?</summary>
<author>
<name>Rich Rosen</name>
<uri>http://www.neurozen.com/website/</uri>
</author>

<category term="bettergmail" label="BetterGmail" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="folders4gmail" label="Folders4Gmail" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="gmail" label="Gmail" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
Gmail had a great idea: replacing the limitations of hierarchical folders with the flexibility of labels. Now they are promoting the notion that they&apos;ve &quot;improved&quot; Gmail by making labels work more like folders. How is that an improvement?
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>There&apos;s a newspaper in my iPhone</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/04/theres-a-newspaper-in-my-iphon.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35895</id>

<published>2009-04-17T23:14:35Z</published>
<updated>2009-04-17T23:14:35Z</updated>

<summary>As the &quot;death of the newspaper&quot; gets continuing coverage (mostly on television), new apps bring the New York Times, USA Today, and now The Wall Street Journal, to your iPhone.  I have to ask: why do these apps look so much alike? is there a hidden danger that they might be confused with each other? Looking for an alternative to apps provided by these long-lived journalistic institutions, I decided to download the USA Today iPhone app to see if they did things any differently. While I wouldn&apos;t want to see the Times or the Journal mimicking USA Today&apos;s look-and-feel, they could learn a thing or two from some of the advanced techniques that USA Today employed.</summary>
<author>
<name>Rich Rosen</name>
<uri>http://www.neurozen.com/website/</uri>
</author>

<category term="iphone" label="iphone" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="iphoneapp" label="iphone app" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="newyorktimes" label="new york times" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="newspapers" label="newspapers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="nytimes" label="nytimes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="usatoday" label="usatoday" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="wallstreetjournal" label="wall street journal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="wsj" label="wsj" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
As the &quot;death of the newspaper&quot; gets continuing coverage (mostly on television), new apps bring the New York Times, USA Today, and now The Wall Street Journal, to your iPhone.  I have to ask: why do these apps look so much alike? is there a hidden danger that they might be confused with each other? Looking for an alternative to apps provided by these long-lived journalistic institutions, I decided to download the USA Today iPhone app to see if they did things any differently. While I wouldn&apos;t want to see the Times or the Journal mimicking USA Today&apos;s look-and-feel, they could learn a thing or two from some of the advanced techniques that USA Today employed.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>At last, a new Mac mini...</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/03/at-last-a-new-mac-mini.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35518</id>

<published>2009-03-05T21:35:17Z</published>
<updated>2009-03-05T21:35:17Z</updated>

<summary> This week, Apple finally announced a long-awaited upgrade to the Mac mini product line. If you&apos;re an Apple watcher, you may recall that at MacWorld earlier this year, anticipation was high that Apple would be announcing an update to...</summary>
<author>
<name>Rich Rosen</name>
<uri>http://www.neurozen.com/website/</uri>
</author>

<category term="apple" label="apple" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="macmini" label="mac mini" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
 This week, Apple finally announced a long-awaited upgrade to the Mac mini product line. If you&apos;re an Apple watcher, you may recall that at MacWorld earlier this year, anticipation was high that Apple would be announcing an update to...
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Macworld: Where did the Mac mini go?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/01/macworld-where-did-the-mac-min.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.34868</id>

<published>2009-01-06T21:14:47Z</published>
<updated>2009-01-06T21:14:47Z</updated>

<summary>Everyone seemed to be anticipating that a new version of the Mac mini would be announced at the Macworld conference today. But then... nothing. </summary>
<author>
<name>Rich Rosen</name>
<uri>http://www.neurozen.com/website/</uri>
</author>

<category term="macmini" label="mac mini" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="macworld2009" label="macworld 2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
Everyone seemed to be anticipating that a new version of the Mac mini would be announced at the Macworld conference today. But then... nothing. 
</content>
</entry>

</feed> 