<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Caitlyn Martin on O&apos;Reilly Broadcast</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/" />
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/atom.xml" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2008-08-07://53</id>
<updated>2009-11-20T20:24:55Z</updated>

<generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>

<entry>
<title>The Problem With The Linux Community</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/11/the-problem-with-the-linux-com.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.38554</id>

<published>2009-11-20T20:24:55Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-20T20:24:55Z</updated>

<summary>While I&apos;m very positive about the openSUSE team I must say that I am a lot less sanguine about some in their community.  Some  fans (or really fanatics) came out in force ready to attack the reviewer (me), to question my skills and even my sanity, to attack Ladislav Bodnar for posting the review, to blame the hardware, anything at all but the distro code which is, according to some, &quot;the best release ever&quot;. </summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="distrowatch" label="distrowatch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="opensuse" label="opensuse" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="reviews" label="reviews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
While I&apos;m very positive about the openSUSE team I must say that I am a lot less sanguine about some in their community.  Some  fans (or really fanatics) came out in force ready to attack the reviewer (me), to question my skills and even my sanity, to attack Ladislav Bodnar for posting the review, to blame the hardware, anything at all but the distro code which is, according to some, &quot;the best release ever&quot;. 
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Linux Netbooks:  They&apos;re Still Out There</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/10/linux-netbooks-theyre-still-ou.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.38273</id>

<published>2009-10-23T04:50:12Z</published>
<updated>2009-10-23T04:50:12Z</updated>

<summary>Back in February I wrote about how Linux had gone mainstream as netbooks became ubiquitous.   When my Sylvania netbook died last month and the manufacturer took their sweet time responding to me I was offered a refund by the dealer.  Suddenly I was surveying the market again for a good buy on a netbook preloaded with Linux.  I found a wide variety of systems with Linux available from mainstream outlets and factory direct, at least here in the United States where I live.  While I don&apos;t have updated market share figures it&apos;s clear, despite claims by Microsoft and their supporters, that Linux remains entrenched in the netbook market and is spreading out from there.</summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="desktoplinux" label="desktop linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linuxpreloaded" label="linux preloaded" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="netbook" label="netbook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
Back in February I wrote about how Linux had gone mainstream as netbooks became ubiquitous.   When my Sylvania netbook died last month and the manufacturer took their sweet time responding to me I was offered a refund by the dealer.  Suddenly I was surveying the market again for a good buy on a netbook preloaded with Linux.  I found a wide variety of systems with Linux available from mainstream outlets and factory direct, at least here in the United States where I live.  While I don&apos;t have updated market share figures it&apos;s clear, despite claims by Microsoft and their supporters, that Linux remains entrenched in the netbook market and is spreading out from there.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>The Day The Netbook Died</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/10/the-day-the-netbook-died.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.38117</id>

<published>2009-10-07T05:17:51Z</published>
<updated>2009-10-07T05:17:51Z</updated>

<summary>On that Friday, with no warning, the little netbook failed to boot up.  I couldn&apos;t even get to the BIOS.  For the third time a Sylvania netbook I owned had suffered a premature hardware failure.</summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="hardwarefailure" label="hardware failure" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="netbook" label="netbook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="sylvania" label="sylvania" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
On that Friday, with no warning, the little netbook failed to boot up.  I couldn&apos;t even get to the BIOS.  For the third time a Sylvania netbook I owned had suffered a premature hardware failure.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Report:  Facebook A Haven For Hate Groups</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/09/report-facebook-a-haven-for-ha.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.37968</id>

<published>2009-09-18T05:39:05Z</published>
<updated>2009-09-18T05:39:05Z</updated>

<summary>Dr. Oboler published a new report on Tuesday and this time he has targeted Facebook and with good reason.  Despite a prohibition in the popular social networking website&apos;s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, Facebook has remained a happy home for Holocaust denial and racist &quot;white pride&quot; groups.</summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="censorship" label="censorship" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="facebook" label="facebook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="hatespeech" label="hate speech" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="internet" label="internet" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
Dr. Oboler published a new report on Tuesday and this time he has targeted Facebook and with good reason.  Despite a prohibition in the popular social networking website&apos;s Statement of Rights and Responsibilities, Facebook has remained a happy home for Holocaust denial and racist &quot;white pride&quot; groups.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>The Future of CentOS and Criteria For Choosing a Business Distribution</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/08/the-future-of-centos-and-crite.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.37673</id>

<published>2009-08-06T04:55:28Z</published>
<updated>2009-08-06T04:55:28Z</updated>

<summary>The whole time the dispute between the CentOS developers was in the news development moved forward and patches were released. CentOS was never a one man show.  It was perhaps in danger of forking or a name change but it never really was anywhere near point of death. </summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="centos" label="centos" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="enterprise" label="enterprise" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="scientificlinux" label="scientific linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
The whole time the dispute between the CentOS developers was in the news development moved forward and patches were released. CentOS was never a one man show.  It was perhaps in danger of forking or a name change but it never really was anywhere near point of death. 
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Low End Linux Netbook Prices Continue To Drop</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/06/low-end-linux-netbook-prices-c.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.37326</id>

<published>2009-06-29T20:54:06Z</published>
<updated>2009-06-29T20:54:06Z</updated>

<summary>It almost goes without saying that you won&apos;t find anything that runs Windows at anywhere near these prices.  Oh, and no, that doesn&apos;t mean that Linux is somehow inferior as Windows fans would want you to believe.  It is, however, free of charge.</summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="eeepc" label="eee pc" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="netbooks" label="netbooks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="windows" label="windows" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
It almost goes without saying that you won&apos;t find anything that runs Windows at anywhere near these prices.  Oh, and no, that doesn&apos;t mean that Linux is somehow inferior as Windows fans would want you to believe.  It is, however, free of charge.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>High Netbook Return Rate?  Windows Is the Problem</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/06/high-netbook-return-rate-windo.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.37145</id>

<published>2009-06-09T05:50:44Z</published>
<updated>2009-06-09T05:50:44Z</updated>

<summary>Note that the quoted story wasn&apos;t referring to netbooks running Linux.  It was referring to all Intel Atom powered netbooks.  I am assured over and over again by tech pundits like Mr. Weinberg that nowadays almost all those netbooks run Windows, not Linux.  Did it ever occur to people that Windows might actually be the cause of the disappointment customers face and the high returns? </summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="linuxnetbooksperformancewindows" label="linux netbooks performance windows" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
Note that the quoted story wasn&apos;t referring to netbooks running Linux.  It was referring to all Intel Atom powered netbooks.  I am assured over and over again by tech pundits like Mr. Weinberg that nowadays almost all those netbooks run Windows, not Linux.  Did it ever occur to people that Windows might actually be the cause of the disappointment customers face and the high returns? 
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>The MIPS Processor and the $150 Linux Netbook</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/05/the-mips-processor-and-the-150-1.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.36371</id>

<published>2009-05-28T23:41:39Z</published>
<updated>2009-05-28T23:41:39Z</updated>

<summary>Last week I wrote about two different projections claiming that Linux will recapture 50% of the netbook market, either in three years or by next year.  Compelling MIPS and ARM based systems are the reason I believe those projections are correct.  Current versions of Windows won&apos;t run on ARM or MIPS processor based systems at all. [...] Lightweight, optimized versions of Linux are another matter entirely.  They run just fine for many applications on the MIPS based systems released so far despite processor speeds ranging from 400 to 800 MHz.  If that sounds slow please remember that the original Asus EeePC was underclocked to 600MHz and sold like proverbial hotcakes. 
</summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="linuxnetbooksmipsdebian" label="linux netbooks mips debian" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
Last week I wrote about two different projections claiming that Linux will recapture 50% of the netbook market, either in three years or by next year.  Compelling MIPS and ARM based systems are the reason I believe those projections are correct.  Current versions of Windows won&apos;t run on ARM or MIPS processor based systems at all. [...] Lightweight, optimized versions of Linux are another matter entirely.  They run just fine for many applications on the MIPS based systems released so far despite processor speeds ranging from 400 to 800 MHz.  If that sounds slow please remember that the original Asus EeePC was underclocked to 600MHz and sold like proverbial hotcakes. 

</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Linux To Regain 50% Netbook Market Share</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/05/linux-to-regain-50-netbook-mar.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.36293</id>

<published>2009-05-21T06:00:01Z</published>
<updated>2009-05-21T06:00:01Z</updated>

<summary>The past couple of weeks saw a flurry or articles debating the future of Linux on netbooks.  A report in the Taipei Times on May 9th was picked up by LinuxToday but largely ignored by the tech press and the blogosphere.  Stephen Lim, the General Manager of Taiwan based Linpus Technologies, made the surprising prediction that Linux will regain 50% market share from Windows on netbooks by next year.</summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="linpus" label="linpus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="marketshare" label="market share" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="netbooks" label="netbooks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
The past couple of weeks saw a flurry or articles debating the future of Linux on netbooks.  A report in the Taipei Times on May 9th was picked up by LinuxToday but largely ignored by the tech press and the blogosphere.  Stephen Lim, the General Manager of Taiwan based Linpus Technologies, made the surprising prediction that Linux will regain 50% market share from Windows on netbooks by next year.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>A Linux Netbook Done The Right Way: the Sylvania g Netbook Meso</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/03/a-linux-netbook-done-the-right.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35755</id>

<published>2009-04-01T04:16:42Z</published>
<updated>2009-04-01T04:16:42Z</updated>

<summary>In just over two months of use so far I have been very impressed with the Sylvania g Netbook Meso.  None of the issues, hardware or software, that I encountered with the original g Netbook, are seen in the somewhat newer model.  The Meso has proven to be an upgrade in performance, in reliability, and most definitely in the area of software.  </summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="netbooks" label="netbooks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="sylvania" label="sylvania" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="ubuntu" label="ubuntu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
In just over two months of use so far I have been very impressed with the Sylvania g Netbook Meso.  None of the issues, hardware or software, that I encountered with the original g Netbook, are seen in the somewhat newer model.  The Meso has proven to be an upgrade in performance, in reliability, and most definitely in the area of software.  
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Linux Performance:  Different Distributions, Very Different Results</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/03/linux-performance-different-di.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35548</id>

<published>2009-03-09T22:05:56Z</published>
<updated>2009-03-09T22:05:56Z</updated>

<summary>I almost invariably get a comment to the effect that all Linux distros are essentially the same:  running the same kernel, the same libraries, the same filesystems.  Performance should be essentially the same, right?  The answer is a resounding no. The performance results of different distributions, even ones running the same kernel version, the same core libraries, and the same filesystem can be very, very different. </summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linuxdesktop" label="linux desktop" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="performance" label="performance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="slackware" label="slackware" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
I almost invariably get a comment to the effect that all Linux distros are essentially the same:  running the same kernel, the same libraries, the same filesystems.  Performance should be essentially the same, right?  The answer is a resounding no. The performance results of different distributions, even ones running the same kernel version, the same core libraries, and the same filesystem can be very, very different. 
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Improved Linux Screen Space Management With PekWM</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/03/improved-linux-screen-space-ma.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35535</id>

<published>2009-03-07T22:07:57Z</published>
<updated>2009-03-07T22:07:57Z</updated>

<summary>PekWM offers an additional solution:  window grouping.  It allows a variety of different applications to be grouped together in a single window.  Most everyone is familiar with tabbed browsing by now. Window grouping takes this one step further.  When window grouping is used in PekWM the title bar in the window manager is segmented with each section effectively acting like a tab.  </summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linuxdesktop" label="linux desktop" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="netbooks" label="netbooks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="windowmanager" label="window manager" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
PekWM offers an additional solution:  window grouping.  It allows a variety of different applications to be grouped together in a single window.  Most everyone is familiar with tabbed browsing by now. Window grouping takes this one step further.  When window grouping is used in PekWM the title bar in the window manager is segmented with each section effectively acting like a tab.  
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>VL-Hot:  A Non-polling Alternative To HAL</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/02/vl-hot-a-non-polling-alternati.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35388</id>

<published>2009-02-21T19:14:25Z</published>
<updated>2009-02-21T19:14:25Z</updated>

<summary>VL-Hot is an automounter which provides an alternative to the HAL daemon that provides some but not all of the functionality of HAL without continuously polling hardware.</summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="automounter" label="automounter" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="greencomputing" label="green computing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="vlhot" label="vl-hot" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
VL-Hot is an automounter which provides an alternative to the HAL daemon that provides some but not all of the functionality of HAL without continuously polling hardware.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Netbook Nightmare:  My Experience With the Sylvania g Netbook</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/02/netbook-nightmare-my-experienc.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35311</id>

<published>2009-02-13T18:04:40Z</published>
<updated>2009-02-13T18:04:40Z</updated>

<summary>I would have rated the hardware in this unit highly if it hadn&apos;t failed on me on two consecutive systems. I understand that two units is hardly a scientific sample and that I may just have had really bad luck. Unfortunately the software proved to be a disaster as well.</summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="gos" label="gos" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="netbook" label="netbook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="sylvania" label="sylvania" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
I would have rated the hardware in this unit highly if it hadn&apos;t failed on me on two consecutive systems. I understand that two units is hardly a scientific sample and that I may just have had really bad luck. Unfortunately the software proved to be a disaster as well.
</content>
</entry>

<entry>
<title>Making Slackware and Slackware Derivative Linux Distros Speak Your Language</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/01/making-slackware-and-derivativ.html" />
<id>tag:broadcast.oreilly.com,2009://53.35142</id>

<published>2009-01-29T05:17:18Z</published>
<updated>2009-01-29T05:17:18Z</updated>

<summary>...if you&apos;re willing to edit one or two configuration files and install a few packages you can make Slackware speak your language, working in whatever language you are most comfortable with.</summary>
<author>
<name>Caitlyn Martin</name>
<uri>http://www.mizuhoradio.com/personal/caitlyn/writing.html</uri>
</author>

<category term="languagesupport" label="language support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="linux" label="linux" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="localization" label="localization" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
<category term="slackware" label="slackware" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />

<content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadcast.oreilly.com/">
...if you&apos;re willing to edit one or two configuration files and install a few packages you can make Slackware speak your language, working in whatever language you are most comfortable with.
</content>
</entry>

</feed> 